Can an Employer Be Held Liable for an Employee's Theft?
Full Question:
Answer:
Negligent hiring is a claim made by an injured party against an employer based on the theory that the employer knew or should have known about the employee's background which, if known, indicates a dangerous or untrustworthy character. Pre-employment background checks, employee drug testing, and employment physical exams are some of the ways negligent hiring claims can be avoided.
Roughly half of the states legally recognize that an employer is responsible for, and can be held accountable for, checking the background and references of any job applicant before placing that applicant in a position of high public contact. Employers have been found liable for negligent hiring or retention of dangerous or incompetent employees in most states, including, among others, Alaska, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, New Mexico, and New York. Some of the the types of business employees most at risk to do harm due to failure to make informed hiring decisions include real estate agents (who have keys or know pass-lock combinations), rental apartment personnel, condominium personnel, delivery persons, service and maintenance persons, nursing and convalescent home workers, home health care aides and utility personnel.
Because the claim is based in negligence, it falls under civil law, rather than criminal law. Civil suits typically seek to recover money damages or allow/disallow certain acts, rather than to imprison or punish a person. Civil lawsuits seek to restore the person to the position he/she would occupy before the harmful act, such as out-of-pocket losses for the value of items taken.